Yamaha R3 Vs Ktm Rc 390: The Ultimate Race On The Track!

The Yamaha R3 and KTM RC 390 are two of the most popular entry-level sportbikes on the market, offering a thrilling blend of performance, handling, and affordability. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between these two racing machines, pitting the Yamaha R3 against the KTM RC 390 in a virtual race to determine which one emerges victorious.

Engine and Performance:

At the heart of these sportbikes lies their engines. The Yamaha R3 boasts a parallel-twin 321cc engine that produces 42 horsepower and 29.6 lb-ft of torque. On the other hand, the KTM RC 390 packs a single-cylinder 373cc engine that delivers 44 horsepower and 27.3 lb-ft of torque.

While the RC 390’s engine has a slight edge in power, the R3’s parallel-twin configuration offers smoother power delivery and a more linear torque curve.

Handling and Suspension:

When it comes to handling, both the R3 and RC 390 are agile and responsive machines. The R3 features a traditional steel trellis frame, while the RC 390 employs a lightweight steel trellis frame with a bolt-on subframe.

Suspension duties are handled by a non-adjustable telescopic fork and a preload-adjustable monoshock on the R3. The RC 390, on the other hand, boasts a fully adjustable WP Apex suspension system, providing riders with a wide range of customization options.

Braking and Safety:

Braking performance is crucial for any sportbike, and both the R3 and RC 390 deliver in this regard. The R3 features dual 298mm front discs and a single 220mm rear disc, while the RC 390 comes equipped with dual 320mm front discs and a single 230mm rear disc.

Both bikes also offer ABS as standard equipment, ensuring optimal braking control in all conditions.

Ergonomics and Comfort:

Sportbikes are not known for their comfort, but the R3 and RC 390 make some concessions in this area. The R3 has a slightly more upright riding position, making it more comfortable for longer rides. The RC 390, on the other hand, has a more aggressive riding position, designed for maximum performance on the track.

Technology and Features:

In terms of technology, the RC 390 has a slight advantage over the R3. It features a full-color TFT instrument cluster that displays a wealth of information, including lap times, lean angles, and engine performance data. The R3, on the other hand, has a more traditional LCD instrument cluster.

Price and Availability:

Pricing for the Yamaha R3 and KTM RC 390 varies depending on the market. However, in general, the R3 is slightly more affordable than the RC 390. Both bikes are widely available through authorized dealers.

The Verdict:

Choosing between the Yamaha R3 and KTM RC 390 is a matter of personal preference and intended use. If you prioritize comfort, affordability, and a smoother power delivery, the Yamaha R3 is an excellent choice.

However, if you’re looking for a track-focused machine with exceptional handling, advanced technology, and a more aggressive riding position, the KTM RC 390 is the bike for you.

Information You Need to Know

Q: Which bike is faster?
A: The KTM RC 390 has a slight edge in top speed due to its more powerful engine.

Q: Which bike has better handling?
A: The KTM RC 390 has a more aggressive riding position and fully adjustable suspension, making it more suitable for track use.

Q: Which bike is more comfortable?
A: The Yamaha R3 has a more upright riding position and a softer suspension setup, making it more comfortable for longer rides.

Q: Which bike is more affordable?
A: The Yamaha R3 is generally more affordable than the KTM RC 390.

Q: Which bike has more technology?
A: The KTM RC 390 has a full-color TFT instrument cluster and a variety of electronic rider aids, while the Yamaha R3 has a more traditional LCD instrument cluster.