Chronicling Adventures On Two Stroke
Guide

The Battle Of The Beasts: Suzuki Gixxer Sf Vs Bajaj Pulsar N160!

Matthew is an avid motorbike enthusiast from South London. He started riding bikes as a teenager and has owned over 10 bikes throughout his life. Matthew loves exploring the picturesque British countryside on two wheels and uses his matthewbikelog to document his riding adventures. When he's not out on his...

What To Know

  • The streets have a new set of contenders in the form of the Suzuki Gixxer SF and the Bajaj Pulsar N160.
  • While the Pulsar N160 has a slight edge in power, the Gixxer SF offers a more responsive and refined engine.
  • The Gixxer SF has a 266mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar N160 has a 280mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc.

The streets have a new set of contenders in the form of the Suzuki Gixxer SF and the Bajaj Pulsar N160. Both motorcycles promise a thrilling ride and a sporty stance, but which one truly reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key aspects of both bikes, helping you make an informed decision.

Performance:

Engine and Power:

The Suzuki Gixxer SF boasts a 155cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that produces 13.6 horsepower and 13.8 Nm of torque. The Bajaj Pulsar N160, on the other hand, features a 164.8cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that generates 15.7 horsepower and 14.6 Nm of torque. While the Pulsar N160 has a slight edge in power, the Gixxer SF offers a more responsive and refined engine.

Acceleration and Top Speed:

In terms of acceleration, the Pulsar N160 takes the lead, reaching 0-60 km/h in 4.7 seconds, compared to the Gixxer SF‘s 5.2 seconds. However, the Gixxer SF boasts a higher top speed of 125 km/h, versus the N160’s 120 km/h.

Handling and Braking:

Suspension:

The Suzuki Gixxer SF features telescopic front forks and a monoshock rear suspension, offering a balanced and composed ride. The Bajaj Pulsar N160 employs telescopic front forks and a nitrox monoshock rear suspension, providing a slightly stiffer ride but enhancing stability at higher speeds.

Brakes:

Both the Gixxer SF and Pulsar N160 come equipped with disc brakes at both wheels. The Gixxer SF has a 266mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar N160 has a 280mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc. The Pulsar N160’s larger front disc provides better braking performance and feedback.

Features and Ergonomics:

Features:

The Suzuki Gixxer SF offers a fully digital instrument cluster, LED headlights, and a single-channel ABS system. The Bajaj Pulsar N160 boasts a semi-digital instrument cluster with a gear position indicator, LED headlights, and a single-channel ABS system.

Ergonomics:

The Suzuki Gixxer SF has a more aggressive riding position, with a lower handlebar and higher footpegs. The Bajaj Pulsar N160 offers a more upright and comfortable riding posture, making it better suited for city commuting.

Fuel Efficiency:

The Suzuki Gixxer SF claims a fuel efficiency of around 45 km/l, while the Bajaj Pulsar N160 promises a slightly better 47 km/l. Both bikes offer decent fuel efficiency for everyday riding.

Price and Availability:

The Suzuki Gixxer SF is priced slightly higher than the Bajaj Pulsar N160, ranging from Rs. 1.16 lakhs to Rs. 1.25 lakhs (ex-showroom). The Pulsar N160, on the other hand, is priced between Rs. 1.03 lakhs to Rs. 1.17 lakhs (ex-showroom). Both bikes are widely available across India.

Verdict:

The Suzuki Gixxer SF and Bajaj Pulsar N160 are both excellent choices in the 150-160cc street bike segment. The Gixxer SF offers a more responsive engine, refined handling, and a sportier riding position. The Pulsar N160, on the other hand, has a slight edge in power, better braking performance, and a more comfortable riding posture. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual preferences and riding style.

Frequently Asked Questions:

Q: Which bike offers better acceleration?

A: The Bajaj Pulsar N160 has a slight edge in acceleration, reaching 0-60 km/h in 4.7 seconds.

Q: Which bike has better suspension?

A: The Suzuki Gixxer SF offers a more balanced and composed ride due to its telescopic front forks and monoshock rear suspension.

Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?

A: The Bajaj Pulsar N160 offers slightly better fuel efficiency, with a claimed 47 km/l compared to the Gixxer SF‘s 45 km/l.

Q: Which bike is more comfortable for city riding?

A: The Bajaj Pulsar N160 has a more upright and comfortable riding posture, making it better suited for city commuting.

Q: Which bike is more expensive?

A: The Suzuki Gixxer SF is priced slightly higher than the Bajaj Pulsar N160.

Was this page helpful?

Matthew

Matthew is an avid motorbike enthusiast from South London. He started riding bikes as a teenager and has owned over 10 bikes throughout his life. Matthew loves exploring the picturesque British countryside on two wheels and uses his matthewbikelog to document his riding adventures. When he's not out on his current Yamaha FZ6, Matthew enjoys tinkering with and upgrading his bikes. He has a keen interest in bike mechanics and regularly shares tips on maintenance and repairs with his readers. Matthew also provides gear and equipment reviews, helping other riders choose the best kit for weekend rides or longer touring trips. Beyond talking motorbikes, Matthew's blog gives readers an insight into his life. He shares stories and photos from motorcycle trips around the UK as well as further afield in Europe. Readers often describe Matthew's writing as both entertaining and inspirational; he aims to fuel the wanderlust of other bikers. Through his passion for two-wheel adventures on all types of roads, Matthew explores the freedom that motorcycling brings. He looks forward to many more years of thrills on two wheels and chronicling his experiences on matthewbikelog.
Back to top button