What To Know
- The Indian motorcycle market is brimming with exciting options, and the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 stand out as two of the most popular choices in the quarter-liter segment.
- While the Gixxer SF 250 has a slight edge in power and torque, the Pulsar NS 200 compensates with its lighter weight, resulting in a more spirited performance at lower speeds.
- Braking duties on the Gixxer SF 250 are handled by a 300mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar NS 200 features a 300mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc.
The Indian motorcycle market is brimming with exciting options, and the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 stand out as two of the most popular choices in the quarter-liter segment. Both bikes offer a blend of performance, style, and affordability, making them ideal for riders seeking a sporty yet practical ride. To help you make an informed decision, this comprehensive comparison pits the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 against the Pulsar NS 200, examining their key features, strengths, and weaknesses.
Design and Aesthetics
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 boasts a sharp and aerodynamic design that exudes sportiness. Its sleek bodywork, LED lighting, and aggressive stance give it a street-ready appearance. In contrast, the Pulsar NS 200 features a more muscular and rugged design, with a sculpted fuel tank, muscular fenders, and a sporty exhaust system. Ultimately, the choice between these two designs comes down to personal preference.
Engine and Performance
Under the hood, the Gixxer SF 250 houses a 249cc single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine that produces 26.5 horsepower and 22.6 Nm of torque. The Pulsar NS 200, on the other hand, is powered by a 199.5cc single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that generates 24.5 horsepower and 18.5 Nm of torque. While the Gixxer SF 250 has a slight edge in power and torque, the Pulsar NS 200 compensates with its lighter weight, resulting in a more spirited performance at lower speeds.
Handling and Suspension
Both bikes come equipped with telescopic front forks and a monoshock rear suspension. The Gixxer SF 250 offers slightly stiffer suspension settings, providing better stability and cornering capabilities. However, the Pulsar NS 200’s softer suspension setup offers a more comfortable ride for everyday commuting.
Brakes and Safety
Braking duties on the Gixxer SF 250 are handled by a 300mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar NS 200 features a 300mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc. Both bikes offer single-channel ABS as standard, providing improved safety and braking performance.
Features and Convenience
The Gixxer SF 250 comes with a fully digital instrument cluster, which displays a wealth of information including speed, tachometer, gear position, and fuel level. The Pulsar NS 200, on the other hand, has a semi-digital instrument cluster with an analog tachometer and a digital display for other information. In terms of convenience, both bikes offer features such as a kick-starter, electric start, and a pass switch.
Price and Value for Money
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 retails for approximately Rs. 1.78 lakhs, while the Pulsar NS 200 is priced at around Rs. 1.33 lakhs (all prices ex-showroom). While the Gixxer SF 250 offers a more premium and powerful package, the Pulsar NS 200 provides a more affordable and value-for-money proposition.
The Bottom Line
Choosing between the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and the Pulsar NS 200 depends on your individual preferences and requirements. If you prioritize power, performance, and sharp handling, the Gixxer SF 250 is the better choice. However, if affordability, comfort, and a more versatile ride are your priorities, the Pulsar NS 200 is the more suitable option. Ultimately, both bikes offer excellent value for money and will cater to the needs of a wide range of riders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Which bike has a higher top speed?
A: The Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 has a slightly higher top speed than the Pulsar NS 200.
Q2: Which bike offers better fuel efficiency?
A: The Pulsar NS 200 typically offers slightly better fuel efficiency than the Gixxer SF 250.
Q3: Which bike is more suitable for long-distance riding?
A: The Gixxer SF 250, with its more powerful engine and stiffer suspension, is better suited for long-distance riding.
