What To Know
- While the Gixxer SF 250 has a slight edge in power output, the Pulsar N250 offers a smoother and more refined ride due to its air-cooled engine.
- The Gixxer SF 250 is equipped with telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear, providing a balanced and responsive ride.
- The Pulsar N250, on the other hand, features a telescopic fork at the front and twin gas-charged shock absorbers at the rear, resulting in a more comfortable and plush ride quality.
The Indian motorcycle market has witnessed a surge in demand for quarter-liter motorcycles, with the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and the Bajaj Pulsar N250 emerging as formidable contenders. Both bikes offer a blend of performance, style, and affordability, making them highly sought-after by enthusiasts. In this comprehensive analysis, we delve into the key differences between the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and the Pulsar N250 to help you make an informed decision.
Engine and Performance
The Gixxer SF 250 boasts a 249cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine that produces 26.5 PS of power at 9,000 rpm and 22.6 Nm of torque at 7,500 rpm. In contrast, the Pulsar N250 features a 249.07cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine that generates 24.5 PS of power at 8,750 rpm and 21.5 Nm of torque at 6,500 rpm. While the Gixxer SF 250 has a slight edge in power output, the Pulsar N250 offers a smoother and more refined ride due to its air-cooled engine.
Design and Features
The Gixxer SF 250 sports a sharp and aggressive design, with a fully-faired bodywork that gives it a sporty stance. It features a sleek LED headlamp, a muscular fuel tank, and a split seat setup. The Pulsar N250, on the other hand, has a more conventional streetfighter design, with a naked bodywork and an upright riding position. It comes with a projector headlamp, a sculpted fuel tank, and a single-piece seat. In terms of features, the Gixxer SF 250 offers a fully-digital instrument cluster, while the Pulsar N250 has a semi-digital instrument console.
Suspension and Handling
The Gixxer SF 250 is equipped with telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear, providing a balanced and responsive ride. The Pulsar N250, on the other hand, features a telescopic fork at the front and twin gas-charged shock absorbers at the rear, resulting in a more comfortable and plush ride quality. Both bikes have disc brakes at both ends, with the Gixxer SF 250 offering dual-channel ABS as an optional feature.
Price and Variants
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is available in two variants: the standard variant, priced at ₹1.71 lakh, and the ABS variant, priced at ₹1.82 lakh. The Bajaj Pulsar N250 is offered in a single variant, priced at ₹1.40 lakh. Both prices are ex-showroom, Delhi.
Pros and Cons
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250:
- Pros:
- Powerful engine
- Sporty design
- Optional ABS
- Cons:
- Higher price
- Lack of features
Bajaj Pulsar N250:
- Pros:
- Affordable price
- Comfortable ride
- Refined engine
- Cons:
- Less power
- Limited features
Which Bike Should You Choose?
The choice between the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and the Pulsar N250 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and budget. If you prioritize performance, sporty design, and the latest features, the Gixxer SF 250 is a better option. However, if you’re looking for an affordable, comfortable, and fuel-efficient motorcycle, the Pulsar N250 is a solid choice.
The Verdict
Both the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and the Bajaj Pulsar N250 offer compelling propositions in the quarter-liter motorcycle segment. The Gixxer SF 250 impresses with its powerful engine, sharp design, and optional ABS, while the Pulsar N250 offers an unbeatable combination of affordability, comfort, and refinement. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your specific needs and preferences.
Common Questions and Answers
1. Which bike has a better fuel efficiency?
The Pulsar N250 has a slightly better fuel efficiency than the Gixxer SF 250.
2. Which bike has a more comfortable riding position?
The Pulsar N250 offers a more comfortable riding position due to its upright riding stance and plush suspension.
3. Which bike has a better resale value?
Both bikes have a decent resale value, but the Gixxer SF 250 is likely to retain its value better due to its brand name and performance.
