What To Know
- While the Pulsar NS 160 has a slight edge in power output, the Gixxer SF 150 is known for its smooth and refined performance.
- Both the Gixxer SF 150 and Pulsar NS 160 offer agile handling and a planted feel on the road.
- The Gixxer SF 150 comes equipped with a single disc brake at the front and a drum brake at the rear.
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 and Pulsar NS 160 are two of the most popular sporty commuters in India. Both bikes offer a thrilling riding experience, sporty styling, and competitive performance. However, there are subtle differences between these two machines that may influence your decision. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key aspects of the Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 vs Pulsar NS 160, helping you make an informed choice.
Design and Styling
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 boasts a sleek and aggressive design, inspired by its larger sibling, the Gixxer SF 1000. It features a sharp fairing with angular lines, a muscular fuel tank, and a sporty tail section. The Pulsar NS 160, on the other hand, adopts a more muscular and street-fighter-inspired design. It has a muscular fuel tank with sharp creases, a beefy exhaust, and a stubby tail section. Both bikes offer vibrant color options to match your personal style.
Engine and Performance
The Gixxer SF 150 is powered by a 155cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 14.1 PS of power and 14 Nm of torque. The Pulsar NS 160, on the other hand, features a 160.3cc, oil-cooled, single-cylinder engine that generates 17.2 PS of power and 14.6 Nm of torque. While the Pulsar NS 160 has a slight edge in power output, the Gixxer SF 150 is known for its smooth and refined performance.
Handling and Suspension
Both the Gixxer SF 150 and Pulsar NS 160 offer agile handling and a planted feel on the road. The Gixxer SF 150 has a slightly shorter wheelbase, which makes it more maneuverable in tight spaces. The Pulsar NS 160, however, has a slightly longer wheelbase, which provides improved stability at higher speeds. Both bikes are equipped with telescopic front forks and monoshock rear suspension, offering a comfortable ride quality.
Braking System
The Gixxer SF 150 comes equipped with a single disc brake at the front and a drum brake at the rear. The Pulsar NS 160, on the other hand, boasts a dual-disc braking system with a larger front disc. While both bikes provide adequate stopping power, the Pulsar NS 160 offers better braking performance, especially under hard braking conditions.
Features and Technology
The Gixxer SF 150 offers a basic instrument cluster that includes a speedometer, tachometer, fuel gauge, and trip meter. The Pulsar NS 160, however, features a more comprehensive instrument cluster that includes a digital tachometer, gear indicator, fuel gauge, and a trip meter. Additionally, the Pulsar NS 160 comes with a USB charging port for added convenience.
Price and Availability
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is priced slightly lower than the Pulsar NS 160. The Gixxer SF 150 starts at around $1,300, while the Pulsar NS 160 starts at around $1,400. Both bikes are widely available across India and can be found at authorized dealerships.
Which Bike Should You Choose?
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is an excellent choice for riders who value smooth performance, sleek styling, and maneuverability. The Pulsar NS 160, on the other hand, is ideal for those who prioritize power, braking performance, and a more muscular design. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual preferences and riding style.
Recommendations: The Ultimate Sporty Commuter
Both the Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 and Pulsar NS 160 are exceptional sporty commuters that offer a thrilling riding experience and value for money. While the Gixxer SF 150 excels in smoothness, styling, and maneuverability, the Pulsar NS 160 impresses with its power, braking performance, and features. Whether you’re a seasoned rider or a new enthusiast, these bikes will provide you with years of exhilarating riding pleasure.
Popular Questions
Q: Which bike has a better fuel efficiency?
A: Both bikes offer similar fuel efficiency, ranging from 45-50 km/l depending on riding conditions.
Q: Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
A: The Pulsar NS 160 has a slightly more upright riding position and a longer wheelbase, which makes it more comfortable for extended rides.
Q: Can I use the Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 for occasional track riding?
A: While the Gixxer SF 150 is not specifically designed for track use, it can handle occasional track outings with its sporty handling and responsive engine.
