What To Know
- The Gixxer 250 employs a 300mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar NS 200 features a slightly larger 320mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc.
- The Gixxer 250 offers a claimed mileage of around 40 kmpl, while the Pulsar NS 200 is slightly more frugal, with a claimed mileage of around 45 kmpl.
- However, if you seek a versatile motorcycle with a balanced performance, comfortable ergonomics, and a slightly better fuel economy, the Suzuki Gixxer 250 is the ideal companion.
In the realm of street-dominating motorcycles, two titans stand tall: the Suzuki Gixxer 250 and the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200. Both bikes boast impressive features, performance, and style, making them formidable contenders in the quarter-liter segment. Let’s delve into a comprehensive comparison to determine which motorcycle reigns supreme.
Engine Performance
At the heart of the Gixxer 250 lies a single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine displacing 249cc. It churns out a respectable 26.5 horsepower and 22.6 Nm of torque, promising a spirited ride. On the other hand, the Pulsar NS 200 houses a triple-spark, fuel-injected engine with a displacement of 199.5cc. Despite its smaller size, it generates a slightly higher 23.5 horsepower and 18.3 Nm of torque, offering a punchy performance.
Handling and Suspension
The Gixxer 250 boasts a lightweight chassis and a well-balanced suspension setup. Its telescopic front forks and monoshock rear absorber provide a comfortable and responsive ride, even on uneven roads. The Pulsar NS 200, however, features a longer wheelbase and a more aggressive riding stance. Its telescopic front forks and nitrox-charged rear monoshock offer a slightly stiffer ride, but enhance stability at high speeds.
Braking and Safety
Both the Gixxer 250 and the Pulsar NS 200 come equipped with disc brakes at both ends. The Gixxer 250 employs a 300mm front disc and a 240mm rear disc, while the Pulsar NS 200 features a slightly larger 320mm front disc and a 230mm rear disc. Additionally, the Pulsar NS 200 offers the added safety feature of a single-channel ABS, which prevents wheel lock-ups during hard braking.
Features and Ergonomics
The Gixxer 250 comes with a semi-digital instrument cluster, providing essential ride information. It also features a comfortable upright riding position, suitable for both city commuting and long-distance rides. The Pulsar NS 200, on the other hand, boasts a fully digital instrument cluster with a tachometer, speedometer, and trip meter. Its sporty riding position offers a more aggressive and thrilling experience.
Fuel Efficiency and Value for Money
Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor for daily commuters. The Gixxer 250 offers a claimed mileage of around 40 kmpl, while the Pulsar NS 200 is slightly more frugal, with a claimed mileage of around 45 kmpl. Both bikes offer a reasonable value for money, with the Gixxer 250 priced slightly higher than the Pulsar NS 200.
Takeaways: The Verdict
The Suzuki Gixxer 250 and the Pulsar NS 200 are both exceptional motorcycles that cater to different needs and preferences. If you prioritize raw power, aggressive styling, and a more thrilling riding experience, the Pulsar NS 200 is an excellent choice. However, if you seek a versatile motorcycle with a balanced performance, comfortable ergonomics, and a slightly better fuel economy, the Suzuki Gixxer 250 is the ideal companion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which bike is more powerful, the Suzuki Gixxer 250 or the Pulsar NS 200?
A: The Suzuki Gixxer 250 generates slightly more power than the Pulsar NS 200.
Q: Which bike has a better suspension setup?
A: Both bikes offer a well-balanced suspension setup, but the Gixxer 250 has a slightly more comfortable ride.
Q: Which bike offers better fuel efficiency?
A: The Pulsar NS 200 offers slightly better fuel efficiency than the Gixxer 250.
Q: Which bike is more comfortable for long-distance rides?
A: The Suzuki Gixxer 250 offers a more comfortable upright riding position, making it ideal for long-distance rides.
Q: Which bike has a better instrument cluster?
A: The Pulsar NS 200 has a fully digital instrument cluster with more comprehensive information than the semi-digital cluster on the Gixxer 250.
