Main points
- The Duke 250 offers raw power and agile handling, while the R15 V4 provides refinement, technology, and a more accessible riding experience.
- The KTM Duke 250 is more agile and responsive, while the R15 V4 offers better stability and a more planted feel.
- The R15 V4 is more fuel-efficient and has a lower maintenance cost, making it a better value for money for some riders.
The KTM Duke 250 and the Yamaha R15 V4 are two of the most popular street bikes in their respective segments. Both bikes offer a potent combination of performance, handling, and affordability, making them ideal for both experienced riders and those looking for a thrilling ride. In this comprehensive comparison, we will pit the KTM Duke 250 against the R15 V4 to determine which bike reigns supreme.
Performance: Raw Power and Refinement
The KTM Duke 250 boasts a 248.8 cc single-cylinder, liquid-cooled engine that produces 29.5 horsepower and 24 Nm of torque. The engine’s lively character and responsive throttle make it a joy to ride in urban environments. The R15 V4, on the other hand, features a 155.1 cc liquid-cooled, four-cylinder engine that delivers 18.4 horsepower and 14.2 Nm of torque. While less powerful than the Duke, the R15 V4’s smooth and refined power delivery makes it more accessible for beginner riders.
Handling: Agility vs Stability
The KTM Duke 250’s lightweight trellis frame and agile handling make it a nimble and responsive machine. Its wide handlebars and upright riding position provide excellent control and maneuverability in tight spaces. The R15 V4, with its deltabox frame and sporty riding position, offers a more stable and planted feel. Its lower handlebars and rear-set footpegs give it a more aggressive stance, suitable for spirited riding.
Features: Technology and Convenience
The KTM Duke 250 comes with a basic instrument cluster that provides essential information. The R15 V4, however, boasts a feature-rich digital instrument cluster that includes a gear position indicator, shift light, and Bluetooth connectivity. The R15 V4 also features a slipper clutch, which helps prevent rear wheel lockup during aggressive downshifts.
Comfort: Cruising and Commuting
The KTM Duke 250’s upright riding position and plush seat provide a comfortable ride for both short and long journeys. The R15 V4’s sporty riding position may be less comfortable for extended periods, but its adjustable handlebars allow for some customization.
Safety: Braking and Control
The KTM Duke 250 comes equipped with a single-channel ABS system, while the R15 V4 features a dual-channel ABS system. Both systems provide adequate braking performance, but the R15 V4’s dual-channel ABS offers better stability and control under hard braking.
Value for Money: Price and Ownership
The KTM Duke 250 is priced slightly higher than the R15 V4, but it offers more power and features. The R15 V4, on the other hand, is more fuel-efficient and has a lower maintenance cost. Ultimately, the choice between the two bikes depends on individual preferences and budget.
The Verdict: A Matter of Preference
The KTM Duke 250 and the R15 V4 are both excellent street bikes with unique strengths and weaknesses. The Duke 250 offers raw power and agile handling, while the R15 V4 provides refinement, technology, and a more accessible riding experience. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your riding style, budget, and personal preferences.
Top Questions Asked
Q: Which bike is more powerful?
A: The KTM Duke 250 is more powerful, delivering 29.5 horsepower compared to the R15 V4’s 18.4 horsepower.
Q: Which bike has better handling?
A: The KTM Duke 250 is more agile and responsive, while the R15 V4 offers better stability and a more planted feel.
Q: Which bike has more features?
A: The R15 V4 features a more feature-rich instrument cluster, slipper clutch, and Bluetooth connectivity.
Q: Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
A: The KTM Duke 250 offers a more comfortable riding position for long journeys.
Q: Which bike is better value for money?
A: The R15 V4 is more fuel-efficient and has a lower maintenance cost, making it a better value for money for some riders.
