Quick notes
- While the KTM Duke 200 has a slight edge in power, the FZ 250 offers a more linear and refined power delivery.
- The KTM Duke 200 comes equipped with a single 300mm disc brake in the front and a 230mm disc brake in the rear.
- The FZ 250 has a 282mm disc brake in the front and a 220mm disc brake in the rear.
The KTM Duke 200 and the Yamaha FZ 250 are two of the most sought-after street motorcycles in their respective segments. Both bikes offer a thrilling riding experience, but they differ in several key aspects. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the strengths and weaknesses of the KTM Duke 200 vs FZ 250, helping you make an informed decision about which bike is the perfect fit for your riding style and needs.
Engine and Performance
The KTM Duke 200 is powered by a 199.5cc liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine that delivers 25 horsepower and 19.5 Nm of torque. The Yamaha FZ 250, on the other hand, boasts a 249cc air-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 20.9 horsepower and 20.1 Nm of torque.
While the KTM Duke 200 has a slight edge in power, the FZ 250 offers a more linear and refined power delivery. The FZ 250’s engine pulls smoothly from low revs, making it easier to ride in city traffic.
Handling and Suspension
The KTM Duke 200’s lightweight trellis frame and 43mm upside-down forks provide agile handling and sharp cornering capabilities. The FZ 250’s diamond-type frame and telescopic forks offer a more comfortable ride, but the handling is not as precise as the Duke 200.
Both bikes feature monoshock rear suspensions, with the FZ 250 having a slightly longer travel for improved ride comfort.
Braking and Safety
The KTM Duke 200 comes equipped with a single 300mm disc brake in the front and a 230mm disc brake in the rear. The FZ 250 has a 282mm disc brake in the front and a 220mm disc brake in the rear.
Both bikes offer ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) as standard, ensuring optimal braking performance and preventing wheel lock-ups.
Features and Ergonomics
The KTM Duke 200 features a digital instrument cluster, LED lighting, and a slipper clutch. The FZ 250 has a semi-digital instrument cluster, halogen lighting, and a conventional clutch.
Ergonomically, the Duke 200 has a more aggressive riding position with lower handlebars and a higher footpeg position. The FZ 250 offers a more upright and relaxed riding position, making it more comfortable for long rides.
Price and Value for Money
The KTM Duke 200 is priced slightly higher than the FZ 250. However, it offers a more powerful engine, better handling, and a wider range of features. The FZ 250, on the other hand, provides a more comfortable ride, better fuel economy, and a lower maintenance cost.
Which Bike is Right for You?
The KTM Duke 200 is the ideal choice for riders who prioritize performance and handling. It is a nimble and powerful street machine that delivers an exhilarating riding experience.
The Yamaha FZ 250 is a better option for riders who seek a comfortable and reliable commuter with a smooth power delivery. It offers a more relaxed riding position and better fuel economy.
Recommendations: Making the Perfect Choice
The KTM Duke 200 and the Yamaha FZ 250 are both excellent street motorcycles with their unique strengths and weaknesses. By carefully considering your riding style, preferences, and budget, you can make an informed decision about which bike is the perfect fit for you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which bike has better acceleration?
A: The KTM Duke 200 has a slight edge in acceleration due to its higher power output.
Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
A: The Yamaha FZ 250 is slightly more fuel-efficient than the KTM Duke 200.
Q: Which bike is easier to maintain?
A: The Yamaha FZ 250 has a lower maintenance cost than the KTM Duke 200.
Q: Which bike is more comfortable for long rides?
A: The Yamaha FZ 250 offers a more comfortable ride with its upright riding position and longer suspension travel.
Q: Which bike has better ground clearance?
A: The KTM Duke 200 has a higher ground clearance than the FZ 250, making it better suited for uneven roads.
