Chronicling Adventures On Two Stroke

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Vs Rc 390: Battle Of The Budget Beasts

Key points

  • While the Ninja 400 boasts a larger engine, the RC 390’s single-cylinder configuration provides a unique blend of power and efficiency.
  • Both bikes deliver impressive performance, but the Ninja 400’s higher horsepower and torque figures give it a slight edge in acceleration and top speed.
  • However, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 remains a solid option for those prioritizing comfort, affordability, and a more versatile motorcycle.

In the realm of sportbikes, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 and KTM RC 390 stand as formidable contenders. Both offer a thrilling blend of power, agility, and style, but which one emerges victorious in the head-to-head comparison? This comprehensive guide will delve into the intricacies of each motorcycle, comparing their specifications, performance, and overall experience to determine the ultimate winner.

Engine and Performance

Kawasaki Ninja 400:

  • Parallel-twin engine with 399cc displacement
  • 44.8 horsepower at 10,000 rpm
  • 28.2 lb-ft of torque at 8,000 rpm
  • Six-speed transmission

KTM RC 390:

  • Single-cylinder engine with 373cc displacement
  • 43 horsepower at 9,000 rpm
  • 27.3 lb-ft of torque at 7,000 rpm
  • Six-speed transmission

While the Ninja 400 boasts a larger engine, the RC 390’s single-cylinder configuration provides a unique blend of power and efficiency. Both bikes deliver impressive performance, but the Ninja 400’s higher horsepower and torque figures give it a slight edge in acceleration and top speed.

Handling and Brakes

Kawasaki Ninja 400:

  • Steel trellis frame
  • 41mm inverted front forks
  • Uni-Trak rear suspension
  • Dual 290mm front disc brakes
  • Single 220mm rear disc brake

KTM RC 390:

  • Tubular steel frame
  • WP Apex 43mm inverted front forks
  • WP Apex rear shock
  • Dual 320mm front disc brakes
  • Single 230mm rear disc brake

The Ninja 400’s steel trellis frame and inverted front forks provide a stable and responsive ride. However, the RC 390’s stiffer suspension and larger front disc brakes give it an advantage in cornering and braking capabilities.

Comfort and Ergonomics

Kawasaki Ninja 400:

  • Upright riding position
  • Comfortable seat
  • Adjustable handlebars

KTM RC 390:

  • Aggressive riding position
  • Firm seat
  • Clip-on handlebars

The Ninja 400’s upright riding position and comfortable seat make it more suitable for daily commutes and longer rides. In contrast, the RC 390’s race-inspired ergonomics demand a more aggressive posture, which may be less comfortable for extended periods.

Features and Technology

Kawasaki Ninja 400:

  • LCD instrument cluster
  • LED lighting
  • Assist and slipper clutch

KTM RC 390:

  • TFT instrument cluster
  • LED lighting
  • Ride-by-wire throttle
  • Traction control
  • Cornering ABS

Both bikes offer a range of modern features, but the RC 390 stands out with its TFT instrument cluster, ride-by-wire throttle, and advanced electronic aids. These features enhance the riding experience and provide increased safety.

Price and Value

Kawasaki Ninja 400:

  • Starting at $4,999

KTM RC 390:

  • Starting at $5,799

The Ninja 400 is priced slightly lower than the RC 390, offering a more affordable entry point into the sportbike segment. However, the RC 390’s advanced features and exceptional handling justify its higher price tag.

Which Bike is Right for You?

The choice between the Kawasaki Ninja 400 and KTM RC 390 ultimately depends on your individual preferences and riding style. If you prioritize comfort, affordability, and a balanced all-around performance, the Ninja 400 is an excellent option. If you seek a more aggressive and performance-oriented machine with advanced features, the RC 390 is the clear choice.

Conclusion: The Ultimate Champion

In this comprehensive comparison, the KTM RC 390 emerges as the overall winner. Its exceptional handling, advanced electronics, and thrilling performance make it the superior choice for riders seeking an adrenaline-pumping sportbike experience. However, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 remains a solid option for those prioritizing comfort, affordability, and a more versatile motorcycle.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which bike has a higher top speed?
A: The Kawasaki Ninja 400 has a higher top speed of 112 mph compared to the KTM RC 390’s 108 mph.

Q: Which bike is more fuel-efficient?
A: The KTM RC 390 is more fuel-efficient, achieving an average of 50 mpg compared to the Ninja 400’s 45 mpg.

Q: Which bike is better for beginners?
A: The Kawasaki Ninja 400 is more suitable for beginners due to its more forgiving riding position and lower price point.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Matthew is an avid motorbike enthusiast from South London. He started riding bikes as a teenager and has owned over 10 bikes throughout his life. Matthew loves exploring the picturesque British countryside on two wheels and uses his matthewbikelog to document his riding adventures. When he's not out on his...