Main points
- Two such bikes that have made a name for themselves in this segment are the Hyosung GT250R and the KTM RC 390.
- The Hyosung GT250R has a single 270mm front disc and a dual-piston caliper, which provide adequate stopping power but fall short of the KTM’s precision and feel.
- The Hyosung GT250R has a more understated and upright design with a half-fairing and a more comfortable seat.
Sports bikes have always been the epitome of adrenaline and exhilaration. Two such bikes that have made a name for themselves in this segment are the Hyosung GT250R and the KTM RC 390. In this comprehensive blog post, we delve into the key aspects of these two motorcycles, comparing their performance, features, and value to help you make an informed decision.
Engine Performance
The Hyosung GT250R boasts a 249cc, liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine that produces 27.6 horsepower and 16.7 lb-ft of torque. On the other hand, the KTM RC 390 features a 373cc, liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine that generates 43 horsepower and 26 lb-ft of torque. The KTM’s larger displacement and advanced engine technology give it a significant advantage in terms of power and acceleration.
Handling and Suspension
Both bikes offer agile handling, but the KTM RC 390 stands out with its sharper steering and more precise cornering abilities. Its trellis frame and WP suspension provide excellent stability and feedback, making it a joy to ride on winding roads. The Hyosung GT250R, with its tubular steel frame and conventional suspension, offers a more comfortable ride but may not be as confidence-inspiring in sporty situations.
Braking and Safety
The KTM RC 390 boasts superior braking performance with its Bybre radial calipers and 300mm front disc. The Hyosung GT250R has a single 270mm front disc and a dual-piston caliper, which provide adequate stopping power but fall short of the KTM’s precision and feel. Both bikes come equipped with ABS as standard, ensuring enhanced safety in all riding conditions.
Features and Technology
The KTM RC 390 is packed with advanced features, including a TFT display with Bluetooth connectivity, ride-by-wire throttle, and multiple riding modes. The Hyosung GT250R has a more basic instrument cluster and lacks some of the KTM’s technological features. However, it does offer a USB charging port and a rear seat cowl as standard.
Design and Ergonomics
The KTM RC 390 has an aggressive, track-inspired design with a fully faired bodywork and a low riding position. The Hyosung GT250R has a more understated and upright design with a half-fairing and a more comfortable seat. The ergonomics of both bikes are designed for sporty riding, but the KTM’s aggressive stance may not be suitable for all riders.
Value for Money
The Hyosung GT250R is priced significantly lower than the KTM RC 390, making it a more affordable option for budget-conscious buyers. However, the KTM RC 390 offers superior performance, features, and technology, justifying its higher price tag for those who prioritize these aspects.
The Verdict: Which One is Right for You?
Choosing between the Hyosung GT250R and the KTM RC 390 depends on your individual preferences and budget. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly sports bike with decent performance and basic features, the Hyosung GT250R is a solid option. However, if you demand top-notch performance, cutting-edge technology, and aggressive handling, the KTM RC 390 is the clear winner.
Questions You May Have
Q: Which bike is more powerful?
A: The KTM RC 390 with 43 horsepower vs. the Hyosung GT250R with 27.6 horsepower.
Q: Does the KTM RC 390 have ABS?
A: Yes, both the Hyosung GT250R and the KTM RC 390 come with ABS as standard.
Q: Which bike has a more aggressive design?
A: The KTM RC 390 with its fully faired bodywork and low riding position.
Q: Is the Hyosung GT250R more comfortable to ride?
A: Yes, the Hyosung GT250R has a more upright riding position and a more comfortable seat.
Q: Which bike is better for beginners?
A: The Hyosung GT250R is more beginner-friendly due to its lower power and more forgiving handling.