Quick notes
- The Hornet features dual 296mm front discs and a 240mm rear disc, while the Street Triple 675 boasts dual 310mm front discs and a 220mm rear disc.
- The Hornet offers a more stable and predictable ride, while the Street Triple 675 provides a more thrilling and engaging experience.
- The Honda Hornet is generally more fuel-efficient than the Triumph Street Triple 675, with a claimed fuel consumption of 45 mpg compared to the Street Triple’s 40 mpg.
In the world of mid-sized naked motorcycles, the Honda Hornet and Triumph Street Triple 675 stand as two formidable contenders. Both machines boast impressive performance, agile handling, and distinct personalities. This comprehensive comparison aims to delve into the intricacies of each motorcycle, examining their strengths, weaknesses, and how they stack up against each other.
Design and Styling:
The Honda Hornet exudes a sleek and aggressive stance, with its sharp lines and angular bodywork. In contrast, the Triumph Street Triple 675 presents a more retro-inspired design, featuring round headlights and a sculpted fuel tank. While both motorcycles have their aesthetic appeal, it ultimately boils down to personal preference.
Engine and Performance:
At the heart of the Honda Hornet lies a 919cc inline-four engine, delivering a peak power of 102 horsepower and 72 lb-ft of torque. The Triumph Street Triple 675, on the other hand, is powered by a 675cc inline-three engine that produces 106 horsepower and 59 lb-ft of torque. While the Hornet boasts a larger displacement, the Street Triple 675’s triple-cylinder layout provides a more thrilling and responsive ride.
Handling and Suspension:
The Honda Hornet’s handling is characterized by its stability and predictability, thanks to its rigid frame and 41mm Showa forks. The Triumph Street Triple 675, however, offers a more agile and sporty handling experience, with its lightweight chassis and fully adjustable Showa suspension.
Braking:
Both the Honda Hornet and Triumph Street Triple 675 are equipped with powerful braking systems. The Hornet features dual 296mm front discs and a 240mm rear disc, while the Street Triple 675 boasts dual 310mm front discs and a 220mm rear disc. Both motorcycles provide excellent stopping power and feel.
Features and Technology:
The Honda Hornet comes standard with a digital instrument cluster, LED lighting, and ABS. The Triumph Street Triple 675 offers a more comprehensive suite of features, including a full-color TFT display, quickshifter, and traction control.
Price and Value:
The Honda Hornet typically starts at a lower price point than the Triumph Street Triple 675. However, the Street Triple 675 offers a more extensive range of features and a more refined riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two motorcycles depends on the individual’s budget and priorities.
Verdict:
The Honda Hornet and Triumph Street Triple 675 are both excellent mid-sized naked motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Hornet offers a more stable and predictable ride, while the Street Triple 675 provides a more thrilling and engaging experience. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on your personal riding style and preferences.
Frequently Discussed Topics
Q: Which motorcycle has a more comfortable riding position?
A: Both the Honda Hornet and Triumph Street Triple 675 offer comfortable riding positions, with upright handlebars and well-padded seats. However, the Street Triple 675’s slightly more aggressive riding position may be less comfortable for some riders.
Q: Which motorcycle is more fuel-efficient?
A: The Honda Hornet is generally more fuel-efficient than the Triumph Street Triple 675, with a claimed fuel consumption of 45 mpg compared to the Street Triple’s 40 mpg.
Q: Which motorcycle is more suitable for long-distance touring?
A: While both motorcycles can be used for touring, the Honda Hornet’s more stable handling and comfortable riding position make it a better choice for extended journeys.
