Chronicling Adventures On Two Stroke

996 Suzuki Intruder Vs 800 Engine

Key points

  • While the Intruder had a slight edge in displacement and power, the 800 engine made up for it with its lighter weight and improved fuel efficiency.
  • The Intruder provided a powerful and stylish cruiser experience at a competitive price, while the 800 engine delivered a versatile and fuel-efficient package.
  • The Intruder became a symbol of classic American cruiser styling, while the 800 engine proved its worth as a versatile and capable performer.

The world of motorcycling witnessed a fierce rivalry in 1996 when Suzuki unleashed its Intruder and 800 engine models. Both machines boasted impressive specs and a loyal following, but which one emerged as the true champion? This blog post will delve into the depths of the 1996 Suzuki Intruder vs 800 engine showdown, exploring their key features, performance, and legacy.

Engine Specifications: A Close Call

The heart of the 1996 Suzuki Intruder was its 1400cc, V-twin engine, delivering a robust 72 horsepower. In contrast, the 800 engine featured a smaller 805cc, V-twin configuration, producing a respectable 54 horsepower. While the Intruder had a slight edge in displacement and power, the 800 engine made up for it with its lighter weight and improved fuel efficiency.

Performance Comparison: Power vs Efficiency

On the open road, the 1996 Suzuki Intruder exhibited superior acceleration and top-end speed. Its larger engine allowed for effortless overtaking and cruising at highway speeds. However, the 800 engine’s agility and fuel economy made it the preferred choice for urban commutes and weekend getaways. Its nimble handling and impressive gas mileage proved invaluable in stop-and-go traffic and long-distance rides.

Handling and Comfort: A Matter of Preference

The 1996 Suzuki Intruder’s handling was characterized by a stable and planted feel, thanks to its long wheelbase and low center of gravity. The 800 engine, on the other hand, offered a more responsive and flickable ride, making it more suitable for spirited riding and navigating tight corners. Both models provided ample comfort with their plush seats and upright riding positions.

Styling and Aesthetics: Timeless vs Modern

The 1996 Suzuki Intruder exuded a classic, American cruiser aesthetic with its teardrop fuel tank, chrome accents, and sweeping exhaust pipes. The 800 engine, in contrast, showcased a more modern and sporty design with its angular lines, sleek bodywork, and dual exhaust outlets. Ultimately, the choice between these two styles came down to personal preference.

Reliability and Maintenance: Proven Performers

Both the 1996 Suzuki Intruder and 800 engine have earned a reputation for reliability and low maintenance costs. Their robust engines and durable components ensure years of trouble-free riding. However, the 800 engine’s smaller displacement and simpler design may give it a slight advantage in terms of maintenance intervals and overall longevity.

Value for Money: A Balanced Equation

The 1996 Suzuki Intruder and 800 engine models offered excellent value for money in their respective segments. The Intruder provided a powerful and stylish cruiser experience at a competitive price, while the 800 engine delivered a versatile and fuel-efficient package. Both machines represented a sound investment for riders seeking a reliable and enjoyable motorcycle.

Legacy and Impact: Shaping the Cruiser Landscape

The 1996 Suzuki Intruder and 800 engine left an enduring legacy on the motorcycle industry. The Intruder became a symbol of classic American cruiser styling, while the 800 engine proved its worth as a versatile and capable performer. Together, these models helped define the cruiser segment and continue to inspire riders today.

Quick Answers to Your FAQs

Q: Which model is better for long-distance touring?
A: The 1996 Suzuki Intruder, with its larger engine and more stable handling, is better suited for extended road trips.

Q: Is the 800 engine more fuel-efficient than the Intruder?
A: Yes, the 800 engine’s smaller displacement and lighter weight contribute to its improved fuel economy.

Q: Which model has a more comfortable riding position?
A: Both models offer ample comfort, but the Intruder’s lower seat height and plusher seat may provide a slightly more relaxed ride for taller riders.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Matthew is an avid motorbike enthusiast from South London. He started riding bikes as a teenager and has owned over 10 bikes throughout his life. Matthew loves exploring the picturesque British countryside on two wheels and uses his matthewbikelog to document his riding adventures. When he's not out on his...